About the Institute for the Future

About Future Now


  • IFTF's Future Now draws on research and forecasting at the Institute for the Future, a Palo Alto, CA think tank specializing in the future of technology, health, and organizational change. It began in September 2003.

Who is Future Now?

  • IFTF's Future Now is a group weblog, founded by Institute research director Alex Soojung-Kim Pang in September 2003. Its contributors include IFTF researchers interested in emerging technologies, the future of Asia, and the social and economic impacts on new technologies; IFTF corporate affiliates; academic partners; and members of the Innovation Lab, a Danish futures group with offices in Aarhus and Copenhagen. A complete list of contributors is available here.

The Future of Cities - A conversation about global urbanization in the 21st century

Virtual China

« September 2007 | Main | November 2007 »

49 posts from October 2007

October 31, 2007

links for 2007-10-31

October 30, 2007

Small quake

We had a small earthquake here in the Bay Area this evening. On the Peninsula, where the Institute is located, it probably lasted about 30 seconds or so, and buildings shook a little; but nothing fell over.

Seconds after it was over, I started getting IMs from colleagues, asking if I'd felt the quake too, and how long it had lasted. It was my kids' first earthquake, and so naturally I wanted to explain what an earthquake is (though without the part about the near inevitability of the Bay Area eventually being hit hard by a Hayward Fault quake); so naturally, I fired up Google Earth, found the USGS report (5.6, not so small), and showed them where the epicenter was:

Earthquake

The red star is the epicenter, and the yellow pin is where we live.

A little later, I was curious to see what fault it was on, so I went back online, grabbed a KMZ file from the USGS showing the locations of Bay Area fault lines, and added it into the mix:

Calaveras

Now I could see it was on the Calaveras Fault, not the Hayward, as I'd assumed.

We at IFTF write a lot about how visualization tools create new interpretive possibilities, and how the existence of substantial, free data sets creates new opportunities for amateur science. Turns out we're right.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

links for 2007-10-30

October 29, 2007

Nations favoring tax breaks over direct subsidies for R&D

The OECD's latest Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard reports:

More and more OECD governments are giving firms tax breaks to drive innovation while cutting their direct spending on business research and development (R&D), and are also encouraging public research organisations to commercialise their inventions.... two thirds of the 30 OECD member countries offered businesses tax subsidies in 2006, up from 12 in 1995, and most have tended to make it more generous over the years. Direct government funding financed an average of 7% of business R&D in 2005, down from 11% in 1995.

OECD countries take new approach to fostering innovation

Technorati Tags: , ,

Generation Mesh: Working at Wi-Fi Hotspots

My friend and colleague Laura Forlano has just had a great piece published in Vodafone's Receiver, which provides a view on her ongoing dissertation research into how public Wi-Fi is reshaping work and collaboration:

Here are some excerpts, though I highly suggest a full read.

Vodafone Receiver » #19 | Generation Mesh

For Generation Mesh, Starbucks – as well as independent cafés, parks and other public spaces where it is possible to access the wireless internet – is a vital site for social interaction, professional support, collaboration and, even, community. I use this term in reference to mesh networks, sometimes called ad hoc networks, which are decentralized wireless networks in which every node can both send and receive information. They are dynamic, flexible and self-organizing.....

Seeking to create an officelike atmosphere – in contrast to the prospect of working at home in their pajamas – pioneers have founded collaborative office spaces... In essence, these new, ad hoc organizational forms that rely on clustering, in a "smart mob"-like fashion, around WiFi hotspots are simulating the office environment that they lack as remote workers, telecommuters, freelancers or self-employed workers.....

Cafés, parks and other public spaces, when appropriated as mobile workplaces are still public or semi-public places. As such, they blur, and often reverse or contradict, traditional dichotomies such as employee and employer, work and play, online and offline, public and private, presence and co-presence, individual and community, and local and global. For example, since a significant number of mobile professionals are freelancers, self-employed workers and entrepreneurs, the distinction between employee and employer is not well-defined....

Mobile workplaces are sites in which online and offline activities coexist. This includes the coexistence of knowledge-work, service-work and unemployment....

Full article

Technorati Tags: , , ,

October 28, 2007

links for 2007-10-28

October 27, 2007

links for 2007-10-27

October 26, 2007

David Brooks, cyborg

David Brooks is now augmenting. The piece is over the top, but is one of those "if he's doing it, it's either really big or is really over" data-points.

I have melded my mind with the heavens, communed with the universal consciousness, and experienced the inner calm that externalization brings, and it all started because I bought a car with a G.P.S....

I had thought that the magic of the information age was that it allowed us to know more, but then I realized the magic of the information age is that it allows us to know less. It provides us with external cognitive servants — silicon memory systems, collaborative online filters, consumer preference algorithms and networked knowledge. We can burden these servants and liberate ourselves....

Memory? I’ve externalized it.... [I]f I need to know some fact about the world, I tap a few keys and reap the blessings of the external mind.

Personal information? I’ve externalized it. I’m no longer clear on where I end and my BlackBerry begins....

Now, you may wonder if in the process of outsourcing my thinking I am losing my individuality. Not so. My preferences are more narrow and individualistic than ever. It’s merely my autonomy that I’m losing.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

IBM Seeks to Thwart IP Bandits

Ever since hedge funds started getting into the IP game, big companies have seen greater and greater risks associated with patent infringement. Put simply, the funds - either directly or indirectly - amass piles of patents and then look for firms with deep pockets to sue. It's a real and lucrative threat.

That's why, ironically, IBM is now proposing to patent a new processs for rapid licensing of patents to provide companies with defenses against these tactics. The irony is that IBM has been one of the most vocal sticklers against business process patents.

Technology Review has full coverage:
"IBM says it has a new way to profit from patents -- and wants to patent the idea"

Technorati Tags: , , ,

links for 2007-10-26

October 25, 2007

Going to a place called Lim Kok Wing / Gonna get a big bowl of beef chow mein

The Guardian covered the opening of London's newest university-- a branch of Limkokwing University, which is based in Kuala Lumpur and has campuses in Beijing, Jakarta, and Gabarone (the capital of Botswana).

It's the moment when the empire strikes back - in a good way. For generations, Malaysians have been educated by the old colonial power - either coming to UK universities and colleges or following British-style degree courses at home.

This month, the first Malaysian university to return the favour opened its doors in London's Piccadilly. The grand Victorian edifice on one of the capital's most expensive streets shows that Limkokwing University is determined to make a splash.

There are lots of European and American universities, educational corporations, consultants, etc. involved in joint ventures with Asian universities, or setting up foreign branch campuses. But this is no longer entirely a one-way process.

It may have been inevitable that Limkokwing would move into the European market, given the already-global character of its main campus:

The 6,000 students at Limkokwing University of Creative Technology in Kuala Lumpur come from 150 countries, mostly from the developing world, but increasingly from Europe, where governments like those of Denmark and Germany are keen to expose young people to the culture and business of Asia.

So the strategy of creating branch campuses is part brand extension, part growth opportunity, and part attempt to expand opportunities for global study-- something that schools like this see as particularly important.

All this is neat, in the way that counterintuitive trends can be. But what really sticks with me is something Lim says near the end of the article:

British higher education goes back hundreds of years and Malaysian universities can never match the strong traditions in academic scholarship built up by the British.

However, as a developing country, Malaysia is better able to understand the needs of other developing nations. It is therefore in a better position to deliver British education to the developing world.

In future, British education will be delivered in China and Malaysia and wherever. I don't think that can be stopped and I think it is a good thing for the UK.

"British education" as a model of education, not as something that happens in (or emanates from) a specific geographical location, and can thus be treated as a monopoly. This is disruptive thinking. Or as Kris Olds and Susan Robertson comment,

So a Malaysian university, providing a Malaysian education in London, and a British education in Botswana (to students from over 100 countries)…the global higher ed landscape is indeed changing…

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

More on global trends in universities

A promising-looking source on globalization and higher education: GlobalHigherEd, a blog started by University of Wisconsin geographer Kris Olds, and Bristol professor Susan Robertson. They explain:

We are interested in how and why new knowledge and new spaces (including socio-technical networks) are being developed in association with the emergence of the ‘knowledge economy’, and what the implications of this complex development process are. Three examples of relatively territorialized knowledge spaces are Qatar Education City, Singapore’s ‘Global Schoolhouse’, and the European Higher Education Area, though even in these cases they are fundamentally dependent upon extra-territorial relations and linkages (e.g., see the Singapore-MIT Alliance). Examples of relatively more networked spaces of knowledge production include the Erasmus Mundus programme, and university consortia like the Worldwide Universities Network (WUN) or the International Alliance of Research Universities (IARU). There are also a myriad of fascinating and rarely examined spaces of knowledge production (e.g., non-profit think tanks, private research centres and universities).

A bit on the academic side, but that's perfectly appropriate for a blog about... academia.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Building universities in Saudi Arabia

There's a university-building boom in Saudi Arabia. Given that the kingdom has a growing population and even faster-growing demand for higher education, is raking in vast amounts of money thanks to high oil prices, and is starting to think about its place in a post-oil world (or at least a world in which its reserves are no longer vast enough to give it a dominant position in world the oil market), this development isn't entirely surprising. Last year, the Chronicle of Higher Education noted that

The higher-education ministry's budget has nearly tripled since 2004, to $15-billion, much of which has been spent on opening more than 100 new colleges and universities.... And the government has lifted a decades-old ban on private institutions, offering free land and more than $10-million toward scholarships and building costs.

Earlier this year, the kingdom announced a "government plan to open 11 new universities in the next three years... located throughout the kingdom, [which] will focus on applied sciences."

Today, the New York Times had an article on the ground-breaking of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, a graduate university on the Red Sea. There are several interesting things about the way the university is developing, and how it'll be organized.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Continue reading "Building universities in Saudi Arabia" »

links for 2007-10-25

October 24, 2007

links for 2007-10-24

October 23, 2007

"Twittering while California burns": Social Media and Disasters

I'm fascinated by the use of telecommunications during crises. Rafe Needleman's Webware blog has a great post on the use of Twitter during the fires in San Diego:

Disasters are social: They affect large groups of people, all thrown together by circumstance or location. So when I was at a dinner with Laughing Squid founder Scott Beale two weeks ago and he said, "The next disaster will be Twittered," I thought he was spot on. What better use could there be for a social media site like Twitter than to support people with a dire need to connect to each other and share information? (Full story: Twittering while California burns)

During Katrina, there were all kinds of fascinating uses of new telecom tools - probably the most interesting was the real-time transcription of Louisana State Police scanner traffic by an ad hoc group of IRC chatters (someone had patched their scanner over to an Internet audio stream).

Telecommuting in the US was born after the 1989 Loma Prieta and 1994 Northridge earthquakes. I'm sure we'll see lots of bottom-up ad hoc innovation during this disaster as well.

Here are some of my old papers - Telecommunications Infrastructure in Disasters: Preparing Cities for Crisis Communications and Disaster Forensics: Leveraging Crisis Information Systems for Social Science and a video of a talk I did with Bill Mitchell at MIT on "Trauma and Rebuilding in the Digital Electronic Era".

The Future of Presence

I spent a few days last week in Newcastle, England - a real gem of a town for tech history enthusiasts and urbanists. Newcastle is where the first steam trains and railways were built at the dawn of the industrial revolution. It was the demonstration of Robert Stephenson's Rocket in 1829 (built in Newcastle) that you might mark as the beginning of mass mechanical mobility. Less famously, but relevant to our Future of Work theme, there is also a building on the quayside, that my friend Professor Andy Gillespie pointed out was one of the first office-only commercial buildings ever built.

I was there for the Design of the Times (Dott) 07 festival, a year-long event sponsored by England's Design Council, and organized by John Thackara (of Doors of Perception fame). It was an amazing exhibition at the remarkably restored Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art, an old flour mill cum gallery. This year's Dott was organized around understanding sustainability, and featured a number of funded project that had been running throughout Northeast England all year.

My talk was the keynote for the first of a series of Dott 07 debates, on Movement. (others include Food, Health, and School). The topic I took up - "Must we keep moving?", as I thought more and more about it, became about the Future of Presence. As you'll see in the text of my speech below, I was trying to unpack some of our hopes and fears about the prospects of emerging immersive telecommunications technologies to displace high-energy, high-impact air travel.

Full text after the jump....

Continue reading "The Future of Presence" »

links for 2007-10-23

October 22, 2007

And with this post, I'm going to sleep

I've recently been dipping into the literature on the neuroscience of memory and futures thinking, trying to figure out if there are insights from this work that can help futurists do their work better. After a few months of reading about inter-temporal decision-making, the tangled relationship between memory and imagination, and why we make bad decisions, my eye finds brain-related news pretty quickly. Like this piece on sleep research from the New York Times:

Scientists have been trying to determine why people need sleep for more than 100 years. They have not learned much more than what every new parent quickly finds out: sleep loss makes you more reckless, more emotionally fragile, less able to concentrate and almost certainly more vulnerable to infection. They know, too, that some people get by on as few as three hours a night, even less, and that there are hearty souls who have stayed up for more than week without significant health problems.

Now, a small group of neuroscientists is arguing that at least one vital function of sleep is bound up with learning and memory. A cascade of new findings, in animals and humans, suggest that sleep plays a critical role in flagging and storing important memories, both intellectual and physical, and perhaps in seeing subtle connections that were invisible during waking — a new way to solve a math or Easter egg problem, even an unseen pattern causing stress in a marriage.

The theory is controversial, and some scientists insist that it’s still far from clear whether the sleeping brain can do anything with memories that the waking brain doesn’t also do, in moments of quiet contemplation.

Yet the new research underscores a vast transformation in the way scientists have come to understand the sleeping brain. Once seen as a blank screen, a metaphor for death, it has emerged as an active, purposeful machine, a secretive intelligence that comes out at night to play — and to work — during periods of dreaming and during the netherworld chasms

Technorati Tags: , , ,

DIY Biology

We do a lot of stuff here at the Institute on user-driven innovation. As one of the first nodes on the ARPANet-- the original "users are driving innovation" playground-- and a place that's followed the evolution of online collaboration pretty much since Day 1, it's been interesting to see the concept go mainstream in the last couple years. Now it's clearly spreading from IT and the Web to other areas, including biology. Attila Csordás encouraged bio-DIYers, "do not hesitate:"

[I]n the not so distant future, self-aware citizens may manage their own stem cells, grow them in the garage, and store them in the fridge. It could be a form of autonomous medical self-insurance.

Incredible as it may sound, the basics of molecular biology - what is DNA, how genetic information is coded, how it turns to RNA, which base triplets fits to which amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, that make up your body - can be learnt within 2 hours. Another intensive two weeks in an official lab with an instructor and you can work with them.

Csordás argues that if you can learn the basics of PCR and in vitro cell culture-- both of which are now relatively cheap, well-known technologies-- you can do it. Baris Karadogan (at From Istanbul to Sand Hill Road) draws out some implications:

Welcome to open source science, welcome to do it yourself biology.... With so much information on the Internet and such ready access to scientific data, what Attila wrote about could very well be commonplace in 5-10 years. This is a world where people could be "playing around" with their own biology. I see two big impacts right away.

First, tinkering is the best way to invent things, and this would really push the envelope in scientific and practical discovery. Second, if you think governments are having a hard time figuring out the laws to govern file sharing, let's see how they'll deal with "amateur genetic engineering". This will be a huge issue. Imagine people coming up with "user generated biotechnology".

Update: Attila points me to a recent interview he conducted with biotech startup founder Jim Hardy. "Make no mistake," he argues: "biotech is the next IT."

Technorati Tags: , ,

links for 2007-10-22

October 21, 2007

Chronology

I've recently been absorbed in been Nassim Nicholas Taleb's The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, and so perhaps have been more prepared to catch notice of really curious theories. Via Baris Karadogan's From Instabul to Sand Hill Road, I came across this argument: by Russian mathematician Anatoly T. Fomenko that

the timing of historical events, Chronology, as we know it is wrong (Sir Isaac Newton makes this claim in a paper too). Fomenko asserts that history is off by about 1000 years. Cultures we think to have existed say 200BC is actually 800 AD.

The initial idea comes from analyzing lunar eclipses. There are working laws of physics that allow astronomers to predict exactly when and where on the world an eclipse will happen. We get news of this all the time. They can go backwards in time as well, and match all the recorded eclipses to what the theory predicts. But Fomenko notices (in the works of astronomer Robert Newton) a serious mismatch. Eclipses that were recorded to have happened between 700-1300 AD show lunar behavior that vastly differs from theory and could only be explained by a mysterious non-gravitational force applied on the earth-moon system. However, this mysterious force completely disappears, and everything matches theory, if the dates of the eclipses were wrong and each one actually about 1000 years later than claimed. This surprises Fomenko and he gets obsessed with analyzing chronology.

But he’s a lot smarter than many of us, and devises a statistical method that can determine whether two pieces of text are written in the same time period. Now this is very important, and touches the crux of what I am talking about. Language changes over time. The words we use change. New words are added and some words disappear. The kinds of sentences we construct change over time, and all those changes can be quantified. In a way, the syntax of a document, not its semantics, can be used to determine when it is written. This sounds reasonable and acceptable mathematically. As a result, Fomenko takes a documents said to be written in the times of ancient Rome, and compares it to a documents many years later and concludes that they are statistically from the same time period. There are chapters and chapters comparing kings of ancient Rome to kings of Germany, saying that these two kings were actually the same person.

Fomenko claims,

Unbelievable as it may seem, there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artefact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century. Classical history is firmly based on copies made in the XV-XVII centuries of 'unfortunately lost' originals.

Our theory simply returns the Chronology of World History to the realm of applied mathematics from which it was sequestrated by the clergy in the XVI-XVII centuries. We have developed a valid and verifiable method of historical research based on statistics, astronomy and logic.

For example, computer assisted recalculation of eclipses with detailed descriptions allegedly belonging to Antiquity shows that they either occurred in the Middle Ages or didn't occur at all. A simple application of computational astronomy to the rules of calculation of Easter according to the Easter Book introduced by the Nicean council of alleged 325 AD shows that it definitely could not have taken place before 784 AD.

As an historian, I'm hardly about to buy into the theory; on the other hand, it's an interesting argument.

Technorati Tags:

links for 2007-10-21

October 20, 2007

links for 2007-10-20

October 19, 2007

links for 2007-10-19

October 18, 2007

iPods Causing Crime Wave??

According to a study by the Urban Institute, iPods and cell phones may be triggering a rise in violent crime.  From the study press release:

The gadgets are not just entertaining and convenient; their high value, visibility, and versatility make them "criminogenic"—or "crime-creating," in the vocabulary of criminologists. And their power to distract users can give thieves an advantage.

In the first three months of 2005, major felonies rose 18 percent on New York City's subways; but if iPod and cell phone thefts are excluded, felonies actually declined by 3 percent.

Whether or not it is true, "criminogenic" is a very cool word. 

Update:  MSNBC released a broader story on this today.

Why MySpace Music Matters

Before joining the Institute, I did some work with a small publication called MacTribe. One of the pieces I wrote for the site/magazine was about MySpace Music and its effect on the music industry. That article has recently been posted on MacTribe in two parts and I wanted to post the first part of the article here (most of it is after the jump—click on "Continue reading 'Why MySpace Music Matters'" to get to it). Part 2 of the article can be read here.

The Rise of the Virtual Demo: How MySpace Connects Artists, Labels, and Fans

Teenagers adore it. Young adults use it to pass the time at lame desk jobs and track down people from their past. Predators use it to zero in on potential victims. Parents fear it more than any parent feared the Beatles and Elvis's gyrating hips combined, and other people just think it's a stupid waste of time and energy. So what could possibly make MySpace useful beyond worldwide Internet distraction?

Music, that's what.

Before the dawn of the Internet age, when everybody suddenly fancied themselves an expert in web site design, musicians looking to promote their work had to do so through analog means: demo tapes, flyers, performances at artist showcases, etc. And just because they got a gig or found an A&R exec who’d bite doesn’t mean they’d have the one thing that can keep a musician’s career going for a long time: fans.

The digital revolution made it easy to upload tracks to a server and put them on the Internet, where everybody has access to them. But band web pages required at least rudimentary HTML skills, and not everyone broke down and bought a copy of HTML for Dummies. Now, anybody with a few tracks, a computer, and an Internet connection can create a self-promotion music page thanks to the controversial juggernaut of a social networking site, MySpace.

Continue reading "Why MySpace Music Matters" »

links for 2007-10-18

October 17, 2007

Future of iTunes

Last week, Universal Music announced that it plans to join forces with other major labels to create an online music store—BMG is already in. Universal decided in July that they would not renew their contract with iTunes and will instead offer music to iTunes basically as they please, allowing them to pull the music when they feel like it. Additionally, thanks to a publicized spat between NBC and iTunes over pricing and piracy control, NBC will not renew its contract with iTunes either.   

In light of these developments, Ivan Askwith at Slate ponders the future of iTunes. Can the iTunes Store survive without the content from major labels and networks? Askwith envisions three different scenarios:
"Apple backs down," "The networks back down," and "No one backs down."

In the no one backs down scenario—in my opinion, the most likely—Apple has the ability to become an alternative to a major label by working directly with artists. It's lucrative: bypass the label and market your music through the most successful online music store to date.

Askwith writes:

Through iTunes, Apple could embrace the growing number of musicians looking to escape the confines of the major labels, a roster that includes Radiohead, Trent Reznor, and Madonna. It's doubtful that most artists would agree to release their work exclusively through Apple, but it's not hard to imagine an artist giving Apple an exclusive advance distribution window in exchange for placement in an iPod commercial, a tour sponsorship, and a higher share of revenues than the labels and networks are willing to offer. And while it's outside of its current business model, Apple could even invest in saving fan-favorite television shows from cancellation: Imagine iTunes as the exclusive distributor for Arrested Development, Firefly, or Veronica Mars.

Historical agreements between Beatles' label Apple Corps. and Apple Inc. hindered Jobs and company's ability to get into the music business. But earlier this year the companies agreed to end the long-running trademark dispute. (Despite a variety of teasers, from Jobs demonstrating the iPhone's music capabilities with Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band in his 2007 Macworld Keynote to the use of "The Beat Goes On" for a special September event, we're still waiting for the Beatles catalog to hit iTunes.)

Because of their willingness to jump into the legitimate digital music world while label execs were still trying to figure out how to use Soulseek, Apple really has an advantage. And a withdrawal of major labels means that Jobs can finally come through on his promise to release DRM-free music if the labels would allow. It's also worth nothing that the price of DRM-free music from EMI and other willing indie label participants in iTunes Plus has now dropped to 99 cents a song. How much of this has to do with Amazon's MP3 service—which I found to be amazing when I downloaded the entire Nick Drake catalog two weeks ago—will be left to speculation.

links for 2007-10-17

October 16, 2007

Web 2.0 Technologies: The New Seekers

In "The New Seekers," The Spectator's David Jennings counters Cult of the Amateur author Andrew Keen's bleak vision of anarchy resulting from a "dictatorship of idiots." Jennings believes that Web 2.0 technologies are enriching our culture rather than reducing it to a state of chaos, where everyone fancies themselves experts:

Anarchy is not synonymous with chaos—many of nature'€™s most complex and stable systems could be said to be anarchic. On the contrary, it embraces influence and leadership, if not regulation. Order emerges from disorder and diversity by evolution, and the central innovation and beauty of the Web 2.0 family of technologies is that they find ways to harness and accelerate this emergence, digitising Babel so that it can be processed, distilled and structured.

At the center of this is the shift from passive consumer to active critic, driven by discovery:

Discovery itself is an anarchic and unruly activity: it loves to slip through cracks, disappearing down rabbit holes and making associative leaps between material that may not at first appear to be connected. We all know the pleasure of arriving at the work of a new favourite author, composer or film-maker via what seems an incredibly circuitous path or a chance mention from a friend. It is our natural inquisitiveness that leads us to root out these new discoveries, foraging in the areas that appear most fertile in terms of our tastes.

Web 2.0 technologies, regardless of how short-lived some of them may be, allow us to find connections that we hadn't seen before and learn more about our own taste and the tastes of those in our networks. These "taste trails" pave the way for further discovery and encourage us to become active seekers.

One of my favorite examples of these is Last.FM. After creating an account,  you download a plugin for your media player which "scrobbles"—€”sends track metadata—€”to Last.FM. Over time, Last.FM compiles the data to create public charts of your most listened artists and songs. The site recommends "Neighbours," users with similar music taste, and artists that, through the data collected from all users, align with what you like. Last.FM also has a radio feature that allows you to listen to stations based on your data. There are also journal features and all artist information pages are editable by Last.FM members like a wiki.

Last.FM connects artists to artists, artists to people, and more, making it a fantastic discovery engine and personal music dashboard. I've been using it for a while now so I have a lot of information which might make my profile a fun one to poke around if you're not familiar with the system: http://www.last.fm/user/agreatnotion. One of my favorite features is the Events tab, which allows me to list what shows I have attended/will attend.